Similarities Between Descartes And Hume - 1627 Words

Two famous philosophers came up with different approaches on how we gain our knowledge. Renee Descartes is often known as the father of modern philosophy. He was also a mathematician and scientist. He developed the coordinate system, explained blood circulation and rainbows. He also discovered how the earth orbits the sun. He is a rationalist about knowledge. (Pismenny, 2016) This means that he believes we can gain knowledge through our minds. He argues that you do not need to have experience of something to know it. David Hume, another philosopher, is an empiricist, so he disagrees with Descartes and believes that experience is the only way to gain knowledge. (Hume, 1910) Hume is a Scottish philosopher, historian, economist and essayist. He is also a skeptic and naturalist. (Pismenny, 2016) When it comes to knowledge, Descartes and Hume both have very different approaches, but it can be argued that Hume has the better approach. Descartes is a rationalist about knowledge, so that means he believes that it is possible to gain knowledge through our mind and that we have the ability to know things that we have never seen or experienced before.(Descartes, 1641) He believes that everyone is born with the inherent ability to know two things; mathematics and God. He argues that we have the ability to infer mathematic skills from our minds. (Pismenny, 2016) He also says that we are born with the idea of God and religion already in our minds and that God is responsible forShow MoreRelatedDavid Hume s Bundle 1041 Words   |  5 PagesHume’s ‘bundle’ (written as a reply to Descartes) The silhouette of a subject was drawn by a council of moments and David Hume named it an illusion, humanity named it the self. In the modern ages of philosophy while Rene Descartes’ affect still remains eminent, David Hume comes with an argument which kills the I Descartes created and lets it fly as a ghost in human perception. Not only in the case of the subject, the contrast between Hume’s and Descartes’ ideas can be seen in their search for aRead MoreSelf-Identity Qualities1010 Words   |  4 Pagessame as Y so long as X possesses the same soul, body and consciousness as Y. Descartes theory of dualism supposes that there are two fundamental substances. The body is an example of a material substance, as it can be defined by its dimension, shape, movement, and other extensions. However, an immaterial substance like the mind cannot be defined by such concepts, nor can it be interpreted from sensory data. Descartes argues that the mind is the soul, as it cannot be altered by physiological meansRead MorePhilosophy C100 Quiz 121572 Words   |  7 Pageslistening closely to the teachings of the Delphic Oracle. | 20.   For Aristotle, a marble statue is a combination of   X | matter and form. |    | act and potency. |    | essence and form. |    | All of the above. | 21.   In pointing out some similarities between the early Greek metaphysicians, Aristotle pointed out that they were all concerned with    X | causation. |    | the certitude of sense perception. |    | the impossibility of true knowledge. |    | the Theory of the Forms. | 22.   A ________________Read MoreComparing Philosophers Locke And Hume On Personal Identity1375 Words   |  6 Pages Garrett Intro to Philosophy Dr. Christian University of West Georgia 31 March, 2016 Compare Philosophers Locke and Hume on Personal Identity Introduction The question on personal identity has been a philosophical debate for a long time. Philosophers over time have tried to argue what being a person that one is, from one day to the necessarily contains. In their endless search for philosophical bases on the same, multiple questions on the issues of life and death arise such that the correct answersRead MoreHistory of Modern Psychology Essay754 Words   |  4 Pagesat the present time. Many philosophers can be credited to the development of this science. Starting in the early 18th and 19th centuries philosophers such as Rene’ Descartes and John Locke opened the world of what we know as psychology today. The British empiricists also contributed to psychology. Some of these men include David Hume and David Hartley. Psychology has a long past, yet its real history is short. –Hermann Ebbinghaus 1908 Key Issues in Psychology’s History A psychologist/historianRead MoreDoes God Exist?1074 Words   |  5 PagesAnselm, Descartes, Leibniz and Platinga who are all rationalists. The design argument is rooted in empiricism and proposes that all matters of fact to be discussed based on experiment and observation (much in the same way as science). It uses observation of our world, complex interaction of forces of nature and the scientific laws governing them, to propose that this world is like a complex machine and hence must have a designer. This designer is God and hence it proposes that god exists. Hume, PaleyRead MoreEssay about Descartes vs. Spinoza1588 Words   |  7 Pages Evaluation Comparison Between Descartes and Spinoza About The Paper: What I will do in this following paper is to discuss two very interesting philosophers, Rene Descartes and Benedictus de Spinoza. I will discuss each philosopher’s perspectives and insights on their most recognized theories and thoughts. I will then evaluate them and then give my opinion on the given topic. By doing this, I will contrast the similarities and differences between the two genius minds. ByRead MoreModern Psychology : The Scientific Study Of Mind And Behaviour1637 Words   |  7 Pagesthat ultimately allowed for the transformation of an ancient discipline into the scientific study of the mind. It was 1879 before psychology officially became a science. Previously philosophers endeavoured to understand human nature and the links between the body and the mind - formerly referred to as the soul. In fact, the main concerns of today s psychology, reflect themes that intrigued humanity for thousands of years. â€Å"Psychology has a long past but a short history† (Ebbinghaus, 1908). ThereforeRead MoreThe Argument For The Existence Of God1411 Words   |  6 PagesThe teleological argument expressed unsupported inferences from similarities of experiential remark and materialists supplied other possibilities that are reasonably legal. The cosmological argument failed as well since it not once understandably argued the making of the universe. There are many amazing individuals who’ve consumed an immense sum of time in studying the Bible. Brilliant philosophers like Plato, Paley, Socrates, Descartes, Aristotle, have made arguments whether god truly exists. We mustRead MoreComparing Hegel, Marx, Kants Views on Pantheism Essay978 Words   |  4 PagesGod and the Human soul. God is everlasting and unchangeing he is also perfvect, the human soul is distinctly human, it is changeable. What can possibly make it so that these to can communccre? Well the anseww is Jesus Christ, he was the synthesis between God and humans, being that Jesus was both God and man at the same time. So we are all moving towards a specific goal, and the ore we learn the closer we get and eventually we will arrive, once we have learned enough we will come to the realization